Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7704867
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T23:46:38+00:00 2026-05-31T23:46:38+00:00

I want to extend the IEnumerable class but only for types that can be

  • 0

I want to extend the IEnumerable class but only for types that can be operated (int, decimal, single and double).

Is this doable? I don’t see the way to restrict this:

public static class IEnumerableExtension
{
    public static decimal FindBestSubsequence<T> (this IEnumerable<T> source, out int startIndex, out int endIndex)
    {

    }
}

Thanks in advance.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T23:46:39+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 11:46 pm

    You’re looking for generic constraints but you can’t constrain a type parameter to only be valid for a specific set of types. The closest you could come would be something like:

    public static decimal FindBestSubsequence<T>
        (this IEnumerable<T> source, out int startIndex, out int endIndex)    
         where T : struct, IConvertible, IFormattable, IComparable<T>, IEquatable<T>,
         IComparable
    

    … as those are all interfaces which each of those types implements. However, this wouldn’t prevent, say, Int16 from being used as the type argument. Do you definitely not want it to be applicable for an IEnumerable<short>? What would go wrong if it were used for that?

    You could have a set of non-generic public overloads, which then called to a constrained generic private method:

    public static decimal FindBestSubsequence(this IEnumerable<decimal> source,
        out int startIndex, out int endIndex)
    {
        return FindBestSubsequenceImpl(source, startIndex, endIndex);
    }
    
    public static decimal FindBestSubsequence(this IEnumerable<int> source,
        out int startIndex, out int endIndex)
    {
        return FindBestSubsequenceImpl(source, startIndex, endIndex);
    }
    
    // etc
    
    // Could constrain T more if it was useful in the method, but we know
    // T will only be one of the types we want, because only this class can
    // call this method
    private static decimal FindBestSubsequence<T>
        (IEnumerable<T> source, out int startIndex, out int endIndex)    
         where T : struct
    {
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to extend the DataGrid component so that there is a (read-only) column
I want extend class which have final constructor (in my case it's SimpleXMLElement), but
I want to extend the WebFormViewEngine so that I can perform some post-processing -
This is similiar to Trying to extend ActionView::Helpers::FormBuilder but I don't want to use
I want to extend the basic ControlCollection in VB.NET so I can just add
I want to extend a web server which is only able to handle RPC
I want to extend the functionality of a part of a program that I'm
I have a Django template that I want to extend in multiple places. In
I have a SVG file that I want to extend by adding onclick handlers
In following code, I want to extend the behaviour of a class by deriving/subclassing

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.