Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 654443
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T22:29:42+00:00 2026-05-13T22:29:42+00:00

I want to generate this SQL statement in LINQ: select * from Foo where

  • 0

I want to generate this SQL statement in LINQ:

select * from Foo where Value in ( 1, 2, 3 )

The tricky bit seems to be that Value is a column that allows nulls.

The equivalent LINQ code would seem to be:

IEnumerable<Foo> foos = MyDataContext.Foos;
IEnumerable<int> values = GetMyValues();
var myFoos = from foo in foos
             where values.Contains(foo.Value)
             select foo;

This, of course, doesn’t compile, since foo.Value is an int? and values is typed to int.

I’ve tried this:

IEnumerable<Foo> foos = MyDataContext.Foos;
IEnumerable<int> values = GetMyValues();
IEnumerable<int?> nullables = values.Select( value => new Nullable<int>(value));
var myFoos = from foo in foos
             where nullables.Contains(foo.Value)
             select foo;

…and this:

IEnumerable<Foo> foos = MyDataContext.Foos;
IEnumerable<int> values = GetMyValues();
var myFoos = from foo in foos
             where values.Contains(foo.Value.Value)
             select foo;

Both of these versions give me the results I expect, but they do not generate the SQL I want. It appears that they’re generating full-table results and then doing the Contains() filtering in-memory (ie: in plain LINQ, without -to-SQL); there’s no IN clause in the DataContext log.

Is there a way to generate a SQL IN for Nullable types?

NOTE

As it turns out, the problem I was having didn’t have anything to do Contains or Nullable, and so the phrasing of my question is largely irrelevant. See @Nick Craver’s accepted answer for details.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T22:29:42+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 10:29 pm

    This should work for your example:

    IEnumerable<int> values = GetMyValues();
    var myFoos = from foo in MyDataContext.Foos;
                 where values.Contains(foo.Value.Value)
                 select foo;
    

    Casting as an IEnumerable<T> from the start means execution will be outside of SQL, instead call the IQueryable<Foo> directly. If you cast as IEnumerable and use it in a query, it gets all MyDataContext.Foos then uses that iterator and executes the rest of the query in C# instead of in SQL.

    If you want to run in SQL, don’t cast as IEnumerable anywhere along the way. The effect is the same as using MyDataContext.Foos.AsEnumerable() in the query.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.