Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 906115
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T16:19:57+00:00 2026-05-15T16:19:57+00:00

I want to get two resources using two asynch calls. I want to proceed

  • 0

I want to get two resources using two asynch calls. I want to proceed only when both resources have been retrieved.

How can I do this elegantly in JS?

This would work:

getStuff1(function (result1) {
    getStuff2 (function (result2) {
        // do stuff with result1 and result2
        ....
    }
}

but stuff2 only starts after stuff1 completes. I’d prefer to start stuff2 while waiting on stuff1.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T16:19:57+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 4:19 pm

    If you know that functions are in fact first-class objects in Javascript, you can come up with a fairly elegant solution.

    Without any extra objects, or global variables.

    function callback1() {
      callback1.done = true;
      commonCallback();
    }
    
    function callback2() {
      callback2.done = true;
      commonCallback();
    }
    
    function commonCallback() {
      if (callback1.done && callback2.done) {
        // do stuff, since you know both calls have come back.
      }
    }
    

    Why is this so elegant? Because you’ve encapsulated the data, your scope is free from useless variables and the code is more readable than ever. How cool is that? 🙂


    UPDATE

    And if you want a bit more general solution you may try the following:

    function callback() {
      callback.number -= 1;
      if (callback.number === 0) {
        // do stuff since all calls finished
        callback.last();
      }
    }
    callback.newQueue = function(num, last) {
      callback.number = num;
      callback.last   = last;
    }
    
    // EXAMPLE USAGE
    
    // our last function to be invoked
    function afterEverythingDone(){ alert("done"); }
    
    // create a new callback queue
    callback.newQueue(3, afterEverythingDone);
    
    // as time passes you call the callback
    // function after every request
    callback();
    callback();
    callback();
    
    // after all call is finished
    // afterEverythingDone() executes
    

    Awesomeness again 🙂

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

If all tables I want to delete from have the column gamer_id can i
I want to get the header of a selected tab-item of a tab-control and
I want to use a temp directory that will be unique to this build.
I want the messagebox to only show if the number is equal to 0.
I want to have generalised email templates. Currently I have multiple email templates with
Every time that I want to do a Layout, I'm getting a black layout
I'm working on a project in C# w/ XNA, and I want to reorganize
I am using a 3rd-party rotator object, which is providing a smooth, random rotation
I'm in the process of porting some code from Linux to Mac OS X.
I'm trying to build a Chrome browser extension, that should enhance the way the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.