Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9208083
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T00:32:21+00:00 2026-06-18T00:32:21+00:00

I want to host copyrighted data on a Amazon S3 bucket (to have a

  • 0

I want to host copyrighted data on a Amazon S3 bucket (to have a larger bandwidth available than what my servers can handle) and provide access to these copyrighted data for a large numbers of authorized clients.

My problem is:

  • i create signed expiring HTTPS URL for these resources on the server side
  • these URL are sent to clients via a HTTPS connection
  • when the client uses these URL to download the contents, the URL can be seen in clear for any man-in-the-middle

In details, the URL are created via a Ruby On Rails server using the fog gem.
The mobile clients I’m talking about are iOS devices.
The proxy I’ve used for my test is mitmproxy.

The URL I generated looked like this:

https://mybucket.s3.amazonaws.com/myFileKey?AWSAccessKeyId=AAA&Signature=BBB&Expires=CCC

I’m not a network or security expert but I had found resources stating nothing was going clear over HTTPS connections (for instance, cf. Are HTTPS headers encrypted?). Is it a misconfiguration of my test that led to this clear URL? Any tip on what could have gone wrong here? Is there a real chance I can prevent S3 URL to go clear over the network?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T00:32:22+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 12:32 am

    So firstly, when sending a request over SSL all parameters are encrypted. If you were to look at the traffic going through a normal proxy you wouldn’t be able to read them.

    However, many proxies allow interception of SSL data by creating dummy certificates. This is exactly what mitmproxy does. You may well have enabled this and not realised it (although you would have had to install a client-side certificate to do this).

    The bottom line is that your AWS URLs could be easily intercepted by somebody looking to reverse engineer your app, either through a proxy or by tapping into the binary itself. However, this isn’t a ‘bad thing’ per se: Amazon themselves know this happens, and that’s why they’re not sending the secret key directly in the URL itself, but using a signature.

    I don’t think this is a huge problem for you: after all, you’re creating URLs that expire, so even if someone can get hold of them through a proxy they’ll only be able to access the URL for as long as it is valid. To access your resources post-expiry would require direct access to your secret key. Now, it actually turns out this isn’t impossible (since you’ve probably hard-coded it into your binary), but it’s difficult enough that most users won’t be bothering with it.

    I’d encourage you to be realistic with your security and copyright prevention: when you’ve got client-side native code it’s not a matter of if it gets broken but when.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to host a WCF service with TCP Protocol. I can host the
I have a google web application project that I want to host on github.
I want to host a WCF Data Service (formerly known as ADO.NET data Service)
i have registered a domain and now i want to host it on my
I have an ActiveX control (written in Delphi) which I want to host in
I am using ubuntu and I have some html pages. I want to host
I have a cdialog in mfc and I want to host it in a
I want to host my rails website on Amazon Elestic Beanstalk. I followed this
I have several small projects I want to host on single virtual host using
I want to host MULTIPLE WEBSOCKETS node servers (separate processes). It may be >1000

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.