Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 687399
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T02:07:22+00:00 2026-05-14T02:07:22+00:00

I want to implement a Set in C. Is it OK to use a

  • 0

I want to implement a Set in C.
Is it OK to use a linked list, when creating the SET, or should I use another approach ?

How do you usually implement your own set (if needed).

NOTE:
If I use the Linked List approach, I will probably have the following complexities for Set my operations:

  • init : O(1);
  • destroy: O(n);
  • insert: O(n);
  • remove: O(n);
  • union: O(n*m);
  • intersection: O(n*m);
  • difference: O(n*m);
  • ismember: O(n);
  • issubset: O(n*m);
  • setisequal: O(n*m);

O(n*m) seems may be a little to big especially for huge data… Is there a way to implement my Set more efficient ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T02:07:23+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 2:07 am

    I have used Red-Black trees in the past to build sets.

    Here are the time complexities from the Wikipedia article.

    Space O(n)
    Search O(log n)
    Insert O(log n)
    Delete O(log n)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to implement a paperless filing system and was looking to use WIA
I want to implement forms authentication on an ASP.NET website, the site should seek
I want to implement a panel to set user permissions. So i have a
I want to implement or use some library for an intelligent decimal cut off.
I want to implement a Generic Tree in java and i want to use
I want to implement search functionality for a website (assume it is similar to
I want to implement an automatic update system for a windows application. Right now
I want to implement in Java a class for handling graph data structures. I
I want to implement a two-pass cache system: The first pass generates a PHP
I want to implement an ISAPI filter like feature using HttpModule in IIS7 running

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.