Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 742261
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T08:43:41+00:00 2026-05-14T08:43:41+00:00

I want to know why cant we create object if the constructor is in

  • 0

I want to know why cant we create object if the constructor is in private section. I know that if i make a method static i can call that method using

<classname> :: <methodname(...)>;

But why can’t we create object is what I don’t understand.

I also know if my method is not static then also I can call function by the following:

class A
{
     A();
     public:
        void fun1();
        void fun2();
        void fun3();
};


int main()
{
     A *obj =(A*)malloc(sizeof(A));
     //Here we can't use new A() because constructor is in private 
     //but we can use malloc with it, but it will not call the constructor
     //and hence it is harmful because object may not be in usable state.
     obj->fun1();
     obj->fun2();
     obj->fun3();
}

So, my question is: why can’t we create an object when constructor is private?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T08:43:41+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 8:43 am

    Because it is not accessible to the program, that’s what private means. If you declared a member function or variable private, you would not be able to access them either. Creating private constructors is actually a useful technique in C++, as it allows you to say that only specific classes can create instances of the type. For example:

    class A {
       A() {} // private ctor
       friend class B;
    };
    
    class B {
       public:
         A * MakeA() {
            return new A;
         }
    };
    

    Only B can create A objects – this is useful when implementing the factory pattern.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 366k
  • Answers 366k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If I recall correctly, SQL Server converts the IN statement… May 14, 2026 at 4:37 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You need to pass the Class in your function, something… May 14, 2026 at 4:37 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Boris Guéry is close: HTML: <div id="sign_up_form_wrapper"> <!-- full form… May 14, 2026 at 4:37 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.