Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7036297
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T01:24:26+00:00 2026-05-28T01:24:26+00:00

I want to make an abstract class in c++ with a single, but with

  • 0

I want to make an abstract class in c++ with a single, but with some default implementation.
so that every class that inherits it will have default behavior but you cant create an instance of the base class.
but if i mark foo as pure virtual, I can’t add an implementation to it.

class Base
{
public:
    virtual void foo() =0; //Now I can't add foo implementation
};

My solution was to not have it as a pure virtual, and just hide the constructor.
I’m wondering if its possible to mark the class as pure, but still have some implementation?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T01:24:27+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 1:24 am

    You can add an implementation to a pure virtual function. Classes that derive can use the default implementation by explicitly invoking the base-class-method.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a field in base abstract class. I want to make this field
I have an abstract class AbstractEvent and some real classes extending it. I want
I have style sheet with a class name changebackgroundcolor i want make change in
I have several queues that all extend a Queue class. I want to do
i need help, i have some data coming in xml, i want to make
I've got an abstract class which has a type constraint. But i also want
I have a common assembly/project that has an abstract base class, then several derived
Say I have a abstract base class and I want to have a pure
Is it possible to make an abstract class that handles a pre-render of the
I have one main interface and an abstract class implementing all derivable methods (that

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.