Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 145575
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T08:26:52+00:00 2026-05-11T08:26:52+00:00

I want to otherwise block code execution on the main thread while still allowing

  • 0

I want to otherwise block code execution on the main thread while still allowing UI changes to be displayed.

I tried to come up with a simplified example version of what I’m trying to do; and this is the best I could come up with. Obviously it doesn’t demonstrate the behavior I’m wanting or I wouldn’t be posting the question. I just hope it gives some code context to back my poor explanation of the problem I’m hoping to solve.

Within a button click handler on a form I have this:

    private void button2_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)     {         AutoResetEvent autoResetEvent = new AutoResetEvent(false);          new Thread(delegate()          {             // do something that takes a while.             Thread.Sleep(1000);              // Update UI w/BeginInvoke             this.BeginInvoke(new ThreadStart(                 delegate() {                      this.Text = 'Working... 1';                     this.Refresh();                     Thread.Sleep(1000); // gimme a chance to see the new text                 }));              // do something else that takes a while.             Thread.Sleep(1000);              // Update UI w/Invoke             this.Invoke(new ThreadStart(                 delegate() {                     this.Text = 'Working... 2';                     this.Refresh();                     Thread.Sleep(1000); // gimme a chance to see the new text                 }));              // do something else that takes a while.             Thread.Sleep(1000);              autoResetEvent.Set();         }).Start();           // I want the UI to update during this 4 seconds, even though I'm          // blocking the mainthread         if (autoResetEvent.WaitOne(4000, false))         {             this.Text = 'Event Signalled';         }         else         {             this.Text = 'Event Wait Timeout';         }         Thread.Sleep(1000); // gimme a chance to see the new text         this.Refresh();     } 

If I didn’t set a timout on the WaitOne() the app would deadlock on the Invoke() call.


As to why I’d want to do this, I’ve been tasked with moving one subsystem of an app to do work in a background thread, but still have it block user’s workflow (the main thread) only sometimes and for certain types of work related to that subsystem only.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T08:26:53+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 8:26 am

    I went with something I haven’t seen posted yet which is to use MessageQueues.

    • The MainThread blocks while waiting for the next message on a queue.
    • The background thread posts different types of messages to the MessageQueue.
    • Some of the message types signal the MainThread to update UI elements.
    • Of course, there is a message to tell the MainThread to stop blocking and waiting for messages.

    Seems over the top considering the windows message loop already exists somewhere, but it works.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want the messagebox to only show if the number is equal to 0.
I want to use a temp directory that will be unique to this build.
I want to get the header of a selected tab-item of a tab-control and
I want to have generalised email templates. Currently I have multiple email templates with
Every time that I want to do a Layout, I'm getting a black layout
If all tables I want to delete from have the column gamer_id can i
I'm working on a project in C# w/ XNA, and I want to reorganize
I'm in the process of porting some code from Linux to Mac OS X.
I'm trying to build a Chrome browser extension, that should enhance the way the
I am using a 3rd-party rotator object, which is providing a smooth, random rotation

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.