Home/ Questions/Q 7129191
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-28T11:13:01+00:00

I want to pass around a message as such {up, Distance} {down, Distance} I

  • 0

I want to pass around a message as such

{up, Distance}
{down, Distance}

I could also do this as such

{1, Distance}
{-1, Distance}

The key difference is one is an atom and other an integer. Reading the man pages here:

http://www.erlang.org/doc/efficiency_guide/advanced.html

both an integer and atom take up 1 word in memory. However they mention an atom table and needing to reference it.

My question is, does the atom table get referenced each and every time an atom is used? Which of my examples is the most efficient?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    They will be equally efficient. The integer representation of an atom is used when pattern matching against other terms. The atom table is only used when printing atoms or sending them over the network (these are exceptions where it will be marginally slower to use atoms).

    Favor readability over performance in this case.

    • 0