Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6170655
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T23:04:34+00:00 2026-05-23T23:04:34+00:00

I want to shorten settings bindings {Binding Source={x:Static properties:Settings.Default}, Path=Password} To something like {settingsBinding

  • 0

I want to shorten settings bindings

{Binding Source={x:Static properties:Settings.Default}, Path=Password}

To something like

{settingsBinding Password}

By moving part of declaration to global resource dictionary. But it seems that I can’t declare bindings here. Any ideas how to pull this off?

I want at least make it like this

{Binding Source={StaticResource Settings}, Path=Password}

So I don’t have to include properties namespace every time.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T23:04:35+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 11:04 pm

    To get the first syntax, you have to derive from Binding and specify the source:

    public class SettingsBinding : Binding {
        public SettingsBinding(string path) : base(path) { Source = Settings.Default; }
        public SettingsBinding() { Source = Settings.Default; }
    }
    

    You can then use: {xxx:SettingsBinding Password}. However, you’ll still have to specify the namespace of this class. I won’t recommend this approach though: bindings tend to be quite verbose but you know what is happening since the syntax is always the same.

    To get the second syntax you desire, simply define your x:Static as a resource, eg:

    <Window.Resources>
        <x:Static Member="properties:Settings.Default" x:Key="Settings" />
    </Window.Resources>
    

    You can now reference it using StaticResource.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say I have a singleton class like this: class Settings include Singleton def
I have a URL I want to shorten with a mod_rewrite. In its ugliest
I have this code in a function, and want to shorten it - it
I want to shorten an array so it only contains 30 elements. If for
I want to retrieve the DOM path of a random element in a website
Want to know what the stackoverflow community feels about the various free and non-free
Want my FireFox at work to be in sync with my FireFox at my
I want to loop over the contents of a text file and do a
I want to assign the decimal variable "trans" to the double variable "this.Opacity". decimal
I want to create a Java application bundle for Mac without using Mac. According

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.