Home/ Questions/Q 7555391
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-30T11:35:37+00:00

I want to show 100 items from Azure table, I already know PartitionKey and

  • 0

I want to show 100 items from Azure table, I already know PartitionKey and Rowkey, so for the $filter, something looks like this:

((PartitionKey eq 'js32') and (RowKey eq '18371378441826619420')) or ((PartitionKey eq 'js53') and (RowKey eq '18371389407961060290')) or ((PartitionKey eq 'js37') and (RowKey eq '18371565010300884950')) or ((PartitionKey eq 'js64') and (RowKey eq '18371570522532718663')) or ((PartitionKey eq 'js78') and (RowKey eq '18371571234060779934')) or ((PartitionKey eq 'js18') and (RowKey eq '18371620015195251645')) or ((PartitionKey eq 'js59') and (RowKey eq '18371642621740783008')) or ((PartitionKey eq 'js27') and (RowKey eq '18371653219702884172')) or ((PartitionKey eq 'js79') and (RowKey eq '18371686842261536342')) or ((PartitionKey eq 'js25') and (RowKey eq '18371703202567992223')) or ((PartitionKey eq 'js25') and (RowKey eq '18371721921192859595')) or ((PartitionKey eq 'js40') and (RowKey eq '18371723165056625088')) or ((PartitionKey eq 'js58') and (RowKey eq '18371742515754080322')) or ((PartitionKey eq 'js59') and (RowKey eq '18371742690277511383')) or ((PartitionKey eq 'js27') and (RowKey eq '18371754349415311569')) or ((PartitionKey eq 'js41') and (RowKey eq '18371755036440371353')) or ((PartitionKey eq 'js70') and (RowKey eq '18371790002968340255'))......

Total 100 items (so 100 PartitionKey and 100 RowKey)

But then I got the error: HTTP Error 414. The request URL is too long.

Did you experience this error, how did you solve it?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    HTTP response 414 is not specific to Windows Azure Table Storage: It simply means your request URI is too long. I’ve never run into this, as I typically don’t build queries where multiple individual rows are called out in such a manner. I’m not sure what the max URI length is.

    Having said that: This query doesn’t look like it’s going to be very efficient, as you’re spanning partitions, meaning you’ll be getting back partial results with continuation tokens (at least that’s my guess based on the $filter fragment you presented). More info about continuation tokens and responses here.

    • 0