Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9323185
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 19, 20262026-06-19T04:16:55+00:00 2026-06-19T04:16:55+00:00

I want to specialice a template class to make it behave differently for pointers

  • 0

I want to specialice a template class to make it behave differently for pointers of type Base and all other pointer types. I tried it using enable if. But it’s not working the way i want it. Can anyone tell me what to do about it.
the code that i tried:

class Base
{
};

class Derived:public Base
{
};

class Non_base
{
};

template<class T,class Enable=void> class Vector
{
public:
    Vector()
    {
        cout<<"Constructor of Vector "<<endl;
    }
};



template<class T> class Vector<T*>
{
public:
    Vector()
    {
        cout<<"Constructor of Vector<T *> "<<endl;
    }
};



template<> class Vector<Base*>
{
public:
    Vector()
    {
        cout<<"Constructor of Vector<Base*> fully specialized"<<endl;
    }
};


//template<class T> class Vector<T *>:public Vector<Base *>
//{
//public:
//    Vector()
//    {
//        cout<<"Constructor of Vector<Base*> partially specilized"<<endl;
//    }
//};


template<class T> class Vector<T*,typename enable_if<is_base_of<Base,T>::value>::type>
{
    Vector()
    {
        cout<<"Constructor of Vector<Base*> partially specilized"<<endl;
    }
};
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-19T04:16:57+00:00Added an answer on June 19, 2026 at 4:16 am

    When you add enable_if to a subset of an existing overload set, you usually need to add it to the remaining members as well. When some overloads are enabled, the others must be disabled, or there will be ambiguity.

    template<class T> class Vector<T*,typename enable_if<!is_base_of<Base,T>::value>::type>
    {
    public:
        Vector()
        {
            cout<<"Constructor of Vector<T *> "<<endl;
        }
    };
    

    You don’t need to add enable_if<!…> to the full specialization as it’s already the best match of the set so there cannot be ambiguity.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to specialize a class template with the following function: template <typename T>
I am implementing a generic class, which should behave differently for different sets of
I want to specialize following member function: class foo { template<typename T> T get()
I've got a generic class that manages resources of all kinds of types, but
I want to template the >> and << operators in a class, but I
I have a template class with both a type and a non-type template parameter.
I want to specialize specific function in template class. Eg: template<class T> class A
Given class Foo template <typename T> class Foo { public: ...other methods.. void bar()
class FooInterface { virtual void toggle() = 0; }; template <class TYPE, class CONFIG>
i want a specialize template in a pointer-to-member-function case. Is there a way to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.