Question

I want to understand class files and inner/nested classes a bit better and I’m wondering about the following things:

• Is the InnerClasses attribute used to refer tothe inner/nested classes in the ´containing´ class or is it used in the inner/nested classes to refer to the ‘container’ class?
• Is the InnerClasses attribute in class files sufficient? E.g. Do inner/nested classes have to follow the name mangling with $ or is this just a convention?
• Is there a way to make a class look like an inner/nested class to the JVM without setting the InnerClasses attribute and does this depend on the JLM vendor? (I remember hearing that IBM’s implementation had less strict requirements in some parts.)
• How much does the class loading mechanism of the JVM interact with Java reflection? Would it be possible to make the JVM disagree with the results from Java reflection?

I tried looking it up in the JVM specification but didn’t find a description of the actual mechanism.

I only found this sentence in “The InnerClasses Attribute” remotely connected to my question:

The Java virtual machine does not currently check the consistency of
the InnerClasses attribute with any class file actually representing a
class or interface referenced by the attribute.

Answer 1

A few additions to the previous answer:

Is the InnerClasses attribute used to store the contained inner/nested classes in the containing class or is it used in the inner/nested classes to refer to the ‘container’ class?

The bytecode of every compiled class is stored in a separate .class file. The the actual "inner classes" are not stored in that attribute. As the previous post pointed out, that attribute only points to classes that the compiler knew about when creating the bytecode.

Is the InnerClasses attribute in class files sufficient? E.g. Do inner/nested classes have to follow the name mangling with $ or is this just a convention?

Is there a way to make a class look like an inner/nested class to the JVM without setting the InnerClasses attribute and does this depend on the JLM vendor? (I remember hearing that IBM’s implementation had less strict requirements in some parts.)

For both questions, I am not certain. But I think the concept of inner/nested classes is something that the Java language (and hence the Java compiler provides). In the bytecode, there should not be any difference between a class that was declared as a normal public class and some nested or inner class.
You could easily try out how an given VM handles this like so:

• Create a class with some nested and inner classes
• Write a little program that tries to load and instantiate one of the inner classes through reflection from outside the scope of defining class. You must use reflection here, because the Java compiler will not allow you to instantiate a nested class that is not in scope! If you can successfully instantiate the class, that is evidence that internally the VM does not handle nested and normal classes differently.

How much does the class loading mechanism of the JVM interact with Java reflection? Would it be possible to make the JVM disagree with the results from Java reflection?

I don’t understand this last question. Could you explain a bit more what you mean when you say the VM and reflection should disagree?