Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6924027
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T10:36:40+00:00 2026-05-27T10:36:40+00:00

I want to understand why Rich Decorators over basic types say Int which has

  • 0

I want to understand why Rich Decorators over basic types say Int which has RichInt as type which adds a lot of utility methods ( I guess ) are part of scala.runtime and not say probably scala.util…? Are there any reasons for the same or just they are there because they are there?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T10:36:41+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 10:36 am

    I’d guess it’s because they’re important enough to need to be imported automatically, so there’s no need to expose them in a package like scala.util that contains optional imports that you need to do manually. runtime isn’t a package that users are really supposed to need to look at.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a .exe app which I want to understand better - I can
I want to understand about variables, that has been used in returning function. This
I want to understand what's the difference between those functions, and which of them
I just want understand the meaning of update lost which is solved by transaction.
I want to understand, what type of header files are placed under /includes/ in
I want to understand how tinymce functions. the rich text editor contains an html
I want to understand the efficiency of static classes as I think my basic
I want to understand if code snippets are what I am looking for here.
I want to understand the use of xargs man in Rampion's code : screen
I want to understand the external linkage and internal linkage and their difference. I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.