Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6868689
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T03:27:54+00:00 2026-05-27T03:27:54+00:00

I want to use a dictionary/map data structure in R, similar to Python’s dict

  • 0

I want to use a dictionary/map data structure in R, similar to Python’s dict or C++ STL’s std::map or std::hash_map.

I can do all of the following. Is there a difference in their use and/or performance? And if so, which is the best way to have such a data structure in R?

> mm = c()
> mm["my key"] = 10
> mm[["my key"]]
[1] 10
> mm
my key 
    10

> mm = list()
> mm["my key"] = 10
> mm[["my key"]]
[1] 10
> mm
$`my key`
[1] 10

> mm = vector()
> mm["my key"] = 10
> mm[["my key"]]
[1] 10
> mm
my key 
    10 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T03:27:55+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 3:27 am

    The fastest will be an environment, since they’re hashed by default.

    e <- new.env()
    e$my_key <- 10
    ls(e)
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to use a lookup map or dictionary in a C# application, but
I want to define control styles in a resource dictionary and use those for
i want use some data from a website with web service. i have a
I have simple map-reduce type algorithm, which I want to implement in python and
I want to get use of dictionary items like I do in List generic
I want to use a Dictionary as a private variable in a module. I
hi I want to use a hashmap for words in the dictionary and the
If I want to use objects of this class as keys in a Dictionary,
I don't want to use *args or **kwargs since I can't change function declaration.
I want to use my dictionary keys for output in a grouped table. This

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.