Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6643917
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T00:06:23+00:00 2026-05-26T00:06:23+00:00

I want to use IO monad. But this code do not run with large

  • 0

I want to use IO monad.

But this code do not run with large file.
I am getting a StackOverflowError.
I tried the -DXss option, but it throws the same error.

val main = for {
  l <- getFileLines(file)(collect[String, List]).map(_.run)
  _ <- l.traverse_(putStrLn)
} yield ()

How can I do it?


I wrote Iteratee that is output all element.

def putStrLn[E: Show]: IterV[E, IO[Unit]] = {
  import IterV._
  def step(i: IO[Unit])(input: Input[E]): IterV[E, IO[Unit]] =
    input(el = e => Cont(step(i >|> effects.putStrLn(e.shows))),
      empty = Cont(step(i)),
          eof = Done(i, EOF[E]))
  Cont(step(mzero[IO[Unit]]))
}
val main = for {
  i <- getFileLines(file)(putStrLn).map(_.run)
} yield i.unsafePerformIO

This is also the same result.

I think to be caused by IO implementation.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T00:06:23+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 12:06 am

    This is because scalac is not optimizing loop inside getReaderLines for tail calls. loop is tail recursive but I think the case anonymous function syntax gets in the way.

    Edit: actually it’s not even tail recursive (the wrapping in the IO monad) causes at least one more call after the recursive call. When I was doing my testing yesterday, I was using similar code but I had dropped the IO monad and it was then possible to make the Iteratee tail recursive. The text below, assumes no IO monad…

    I happened to find that out yesterday while experimenting with iteratees. I think changing the signature of loop to this will help (so for the time being you may have to reimplement getFilesLines and getReaderLines:

    @annotations.tailrec
    def loop(it: IterV[String, A]): IO[IterV[String, A]] = it match {
      // ...
    }
    

    We should probably report this to the scalaz folk (and may be open an enhancement ticket for scala).

    This shows what happens (code vaguely similar to getReaderLines.loop):

    @annotation.tailrec
    def f(i: Int): Int = i match {
      case 0 => 0
      case x => f(x - 1)
    }
    // f: (i: Int)Int
    
    @annotation.tailrec
    def g: Int => Int = {
      case 0 => 0
      case x => g(x - 1)
    }
    /* error: could not optimize @tailrec annotated method g: 
    it contains a recursive call not in tail position
           def g: Int => Int = {
                               ^
    */
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want use math operations in XAML code but I dont know how?
I have a transaction log file in CSV format that I want use to
I want to use the MultipleLookupField control in a web page that will run
I want to use the Web Browser control within an mono application, but when
I have tried this in multiple ways: if-then-else, guards, case statements but I never
I want use a typedef struct that isn't already defined, but it is later.
I want use html5's new tag to play a wav file (currently only supported
I want use ORDER BY RAND() query mysql. But I have some question want
I need to use HTML comments to store specific data, but I don't want
Let's say we want to use ReaderT [(a,b)] over the Maybe monad, and then

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.