Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6573761
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T15:10:29+00:00 2026-05-25T15:10:29+00:00

I want to use lock or a similar synchronization to protect a critical section.

  • 0

I want to use lock or a similar synchronization to protect a critical section. At the same time I want to listen to a CancellationToken.

Right now I’m using a mutex like this, but mutex doesn’t have as good performance. Can I use any of other synchronization classes (including the new .Net 4.0) instead of the mutex?

WaitHandle.WaitAny(new[] { CancelToken.WaitHandle, _mutex});
CancelToken.ThrowIfCancellationRequested();
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T15:10:30+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 3:10 pm

    Take a look at the new .NET 4.0 Framework feature SemaphoreSlim Class. It provides SemaphoreSlim.Wait(CancellationToken) method.

    Blocks the current thread until it can enter the SemaphoreSlim, while
    observing a CancellationToken

    From some point of view using Semaphore in such simple case could be an overhead because initially it was designed to provide an access for multiple threads, but perhaps you might find it useful.

    EDIT: The code snippet

    CancellationToken token = new CancellationToken();            
    SemaphoreSlim semaphore = new SemaphoreSlim(1,1);
    bool tokenCanceled = false;
    
    try {
       try {
          // block section entrance for other threads
          semaphore.Wait(token);
       }
       catch (OperationCanceledException) {
          // The token was canceled and the semaphore was NOT entered...
          tokenCanceled = true;
       }
       // critical section code
       // ...
       if (token.IsCancellationRequested)
       {
           // ...
       }
    }
    finally { 
       if (!tokenCanceled)
          semaphore.Release();
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to use InterlockedExchange from the WinAPI to use a lock free synchronization
I want to lock back button while my data process. I use AsyncTask to
I want use this 1 for using Bar code or QR code scanner. I
Say I want to implement a database with a lock system, and I use
I want to use Core Data in background threads and NSOperationQueue. Now I thought
I want to use Metrical with my brand-new Rails project using Ruby 1.9 hash
dont want to use css frameworks like 960 cause that will lock the width.
I want to use a ConcurrentLinkedQueue in an atomic lock-free manner: Several concurrent threads
I want to use SendInput via C++ to lock the computer ( Windows+L ).
I want to use shared_mutex with shared/unique locks for read/write. Now if I have

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.