Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6063111
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T09:07:43+00:00 2026-05-23T09:07:43+00:00

I want to write a method with signature Expression<Func<T, bool>> Foo<T>() . My class

  • 0

I want to write a method with signature Expression<Func<T, bool>> Foo<T>(). My class U inherits from T. I want to include U-specific processing in this delegate. The problem is, T can’t be implicitly converted to U. Is there any way I can access U-specific properties in this method?

Complication: I also have type V : T which I want to be handled, so I can’t just take advantage of variance by replacing T with U in the signature.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T09:07:44+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 9:07 am

    I ended up using separate overloads: (), (myVar) where T : U, and (myvar, myvar2) where T : V. That did the trick and I lucked out because each parameter is an app value that corresponds with an entity property.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Give a base class Base , I want to write a method Test, like
I want to write method to send SMS on number and with text from
I want to write a method named IsExtensionMethod that its signature is : public
I want to write a generic method with the following signature : IList<T> Sort<T>
If I attempt to write two overloads of a method, one accepting an Expression<Func<T>>
?string.Format(CultureInfo.GetCultureInfo(en-US), {0:d}, now) 4/12/2010 ?string.Format(CultureInfo.GetCultureInfo(fr-FR), {0:d}, now) 12/04/2010 I want to write a method:
I want to re-write a method that has way too many nested if statements.
I want to write a C# method that can accept any number. Something like:
OK, I know what you're thinking, "why write a method you do not want
do you know, how to write signature of a function or method for operator<<

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.