Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8698375
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T01:43:05+00:00 2026-06-13T01:43:05+00:00

I want to write some try and catch that catch any type or exception,

  • 0

I want to write some try and catch that catch any type or exception, is this code is enough (that’s the way to do in Java)?

try {
code....
}
catch (Exception ex){}

Or should it be

try {
code....
}
catch {}

?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T01:43:05+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 1:43 am

    Both approaches will catch all exceptions. There is no significant difference between your two code examples except that the first will generate a compiler warning because ex is declared but not used.

    But note that some exceptions are special and will be rethrown automatically.

    ThreadAbortException is a special exception that can be caught, but it will automatically be raised again at the end of the catch block.

    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.threading.threadabortexception.aspx


    As mentioned in the comments, it is usually a very bad idea to catch and ignore all exceptions. Usually you want to do one of the following instead:

    • Catch and ignore a specific exception that you know is not fatal.

      catch (SomeSpecificException)
      {
          // Ignore this exception.
      }
      
    • Catch and log all exceptions.

      catch (Exception e)
      {
          // Something unexpected went wrong.
          Log(e);
          // Maybe it is also necessary to terminate / restart the application.
      }
      
    • Catch all exceptions, do some cleanup, then rethrow the exception.

      catch
      {
          SomeCleanUp();
          throw;
      }
      

    Note that in the last case the exception is rethrown using throw; and not throw ex;.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to write some plugin to analysis Java source code. Which part of
I want to write a check for some conditions without having to use try/catch
I want to write some configuration in web.config file, that will make my ASP.Net
I want to write some games, but I don't have any game development experience.
Is there any way I could catch any uncaught exception in javascript? I mean,
I want to write some unit tests for an interceptor that intercepts the Loggable
We've all heard that in Java 7 we can write: try { //something with
I have some code that uses the Swing/AWT printing functionality that I want to
I want to write some tel numbers to excel file, some of them start
I want to write some integration-tests for my connect-middleware and test it with real-http-requests

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.