Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7961359
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 4, 20262026-06-04T05:00:49+00:00 2026-06-04T05:00:49+00:00

I wanted to measure my disk throughput using the following command: dd if=/dev/zero of=/mydir/junkfile

  • 0

I wanted to measure my disk throughput using the following command:

dd if=/dev/zero of=/mydir/junkfile bs=4k count=125000

If the junkfile exists, my disk throughput is 6 times smaller than if junkfile does not exist. I have repeated that many times and the results hold. Anybody knows why?

Thanks,

Amir.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-04T05:00:50+00:00Added an answer on June 4, 2026 at 5:00 am

    In order to minimize disk caching, you need to copy an amount
    significantly larger than the amount of memory in your system. 2X the
    amount of RAM in your server is a useful amount.

    from http://www.westnet.com/~gsmith/content/postgresql/pg-disktesting.htm

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Just wanted to know if anyone is really using Objects and Collections in Oracle
I wanted to write something basic in assembly under Windows. I'm using NASM, but
I wanted to implement python com server using win32com extensions. Then consume the server
Wanted to try something new, using the awesome twitter bootstrap and their Less CSS
I wanted your advice for the best design approach at the following Python project.
I wanted to use gnu time to measure running time of some little .c
Wanted A command line HTML5 beautifier running under Linux. Input Garbled, ugly HTML5 code.
I wanted to generate a load on my web application to measure/test that how
Wanted an easy way to extract year month and day from a string. Using
Wanted to know if someone had a suggestion on code or maybe there's a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.