Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3282606
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T19:56:48+00:00 2026-05-17T19:56:48+00:00

I wanted to move a sql file to my staging server that was related

  • 0

I wanted to move a sql file to my staging server that was related to some coding. I overlooked the fact that it was 1Gig in size and committed the file. I don’t remember if it ever finished committing but I continued committing other changes from different files. Now when I’m on my staging server and I fetch or pull the changes from development I get an out of memory error. I watched top on my dev system and all of the memory is being used during the fetch.

Is there a way to have Git just totally forget I ever committed the large sql file?
My dev system is MacOS and the staging is Linux.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T19:56:49+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 7:56 pm

    Yes. But you’ll have to inform anyone who pulled to re-clone the repository to avoid headaches later. What you need to do is rebase-interactive the branch where the commit is and delete the commit. The commit will stay around for about 30 days (by default) from the moment no other reference (branch, tag etc.) refers to it. This gives you enough time to change your mind later. Of course, if you wish you can prune the reflog and then garbage-collect the repository to shrink the repository right away.

    For example:

    git checkout contaminated-branch
    git rebase -i HEAD~100  # if 100 commits ago is long enough
    

    Then you’ll have an editor open up, listing the commits since 100 commits ago. Find the commit where you added that large file, and delete its row in the editor. Save and quit.

    This will invalidate everyone’s repository if they pulled from that repository after you committed that large file. Make sure to be nice to them today.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've created small database under SQL Server 2008 . Now i wanted to move
I wanted some of those spiffy rounded corners for a web project that I'm
if i wanted a background that deosnt move(stays static) so only the page moves
Wanted to get some consensus around a UI feature I'm working on right now.
I wanted to emulate a popular flash game, Chrontron, in C++ and needed some
I wanted to generate one fix view using interface builder, but the size of
I wanted to do something like this: <asp:Label ID=lblMyLabel onclick=lblMyLabel_Click runat=server>My Label</asp:Label> I know
I was helping out some colleagues of mine with an SQL problem. Mainly they
We have multi GB files coming every day to be loaded to SQL Server
I know the topic I started is too subjective. But I just wanted some

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.