Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 111133
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T02:20:11+00:00 2026-05-11T02:20:11+00:00

I was always curious is there any possibility to overload function literal, something like

  • 0

I was always curious is there any possibility to overload function literal, something like you can do with Function:

var test=Function; Function=function(arg) {       alert('test');       return test(arg); }  var b=Function('alert('a')'); var c=Function('alert('x')'); b(); c(); 

Of course you can guess that this is nice way of debugging whole project. However any effort I made here goes for nothing.

Question for you experts is:

  1. Maybe there is something that i don’t know, maybe there is possibility to overload this damn constructor? (but probably not).
  2. If not then – how to do this – if this possible – in any of browser (not just by using javascript – but their extended language – every browser got something like this).
  3. If not then – how this is done trough addOn like firebug or etc. ??
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 4 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T02:20:12+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 2:20 am

    You’re terminology is off: Function() is the function constructor, whereas function() {...} is a function literal.

    And no, I don’t think there’s a portable way to do this, but there might be for old versions of Firefox: If I remember correctly, it once was possible to use with() {...} to shadow the built-in constructor functions and Firefox would use the new ones even for literals.

    This seems to work no longer:

    var overload = {     Object : function() {} };  overload.Object.prototype.foo = 'bar';  with(overload) {     document.writeln(new Object().foo);     document.writeln({}.foo); } 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've always been curious: how can I perform arithmetic operations on very long decimals--for
I've always been curious, why does the time(time_t *) function both return a time_t
Are there any guarantees that realloc() will always shrink a buffer in-place?? So that
Is there any real sequence of characters that always compares greater than any other
This question made me curious. Questions like this always get answers like It's generally
Here's something I've always been curious about, but never thought to ask. Is it
I know this is a subjective question, but I'm always curious about best-practices in
It always feels wrong to me to write if (MyObject) // do something Or
We always write functions or classes and their logic is very complicated. If there
I'm curious about the performance characteristics of Parallel.ForEach. Given any valid construct inside a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.