Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1048253
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T16:25:37+00:00 2026-05-16T16:25:37+00:00

I was checking a friend’s code, and this pattern showed up quite a bit

  • 0

I was checking a friend’s code, and this pattern showed up quite a bit whenever he wrote functions that returned a boolean value:

def multiple_of_three(n):
    if (n % 3) is 0:
       return True
    else:
       return False

I maintain that it’s simpler (and perhaps a bit faster) to write:

def multiple_of_three(n):
    return (n % 3) is 0

Am I correct that the second implementation is faster? Also, is it any less readable or somehow frowned upon?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T16:25:38+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 4:25 pm

    I very much doubt there is a compiler or interpreter still out there where there is a significant speed difference – most will generate exactly the same code in both situations. But your “direct return” method is, in my opinion, clearer and more maintainable.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

when checking the source code of a site on firefox I got this on
Checking few RDBMS I find that things like SELECT COUNT (a), SUM (b) FROM
Checking the documentation online I saw that it is pass by reference. Can someone
When checking for nulls I use this: String str; if(str == null){ //... }
After checking out code for the first time from a repository into Eclipse using
I'm studying Java. And i wanted to make the code for checking a 2D
checking this sample. http://html5demos.com/drag i was wonder how to get when You drop a
I'm currently building a very low level CMS for friend's artist web page that
I've got a bit of an odd question. A friend of mine and I
I have an app that uses quite a few graphics in it. When I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.