Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6151221
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T19:44:24+00:00 2026-05-23T19:44:24+00:00

I was creating an integer and i wanted to instantiate it with 0 before

  • 0

I was creating an integer and i wanted to instantiate it with 0 before working with.

I wrote firstly

int i = default(int);

then i removed it to replace with the other one which is

int i = 0;

I would like to know if my choice is the best in mini mini performance.
Will the default() function increase the instructions at compile time?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T19:44:24+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 7:44 pm

    No, they are resolved at compile time and produce the same IL. Value types will be 0 (or false if you have a bool, but that’s still 0) and reference types are null.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm creating a structure of Rationals (int * int) and one of my functions
I am creating a table with two primary keys. The first one is id(Integer)
I'm creating an XML document. I got it to indent using TransformerFactory.setAttribute(indent-number, new Integer(2));
I am about to start working on something the requires reading bytes and creating
For learning purposes I'm creating big integer class in C++. There are 2 files:
I am creating a jasper report.In that I want to write one method which
I am creating a code in which i want to pass integer value for
I'm creating a JasperReport using iReport, and as such, I'm limited* to one SQL
When creating a table in PostgreSQL, default constraint names will assigned if not provided:
I had a very similar problem before where i wanted to show random xml

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.