Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8799781
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T00:24:53+00:00 2026-06-14T00:24:53+00:00

I was doing a review of some code and came across an instance of

  • 0

I was doing a review of some code and came across an instance of someone post-incrementing a member variable that was a wrapper class around Integer. I tried it myself and was genuinely surprised that it works.

Integer x = 0; 
System.out.print(x++ + ", ");
System.out.print(x);

This prints out 0, 1, not 0, 0 as I would have expected. I’ve looked through the language specification and can’t find anything covering this. Can anyone explain to me why this works and if it’s safe across multiple platforms? I would have thought that this would decompose into

Integer x = 0;
int temp1 = x.intValue();
int temp2 = temp1 + 1;
System.out.println(temp1);
temp1 = temp2;
System.out.println(x.intValue());

But apparently there’s something in the specification that make it add x = temp1; before the last line

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T00:24:54+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 12:24 am

    It’s perfectly safe to use across platforms. The behavior is specified in §15.4.2 of the Java Language Specification (emphasis added):

    The result of the postfix expression must be a variable of a type that is convertible (§5.1.8) to a numeric type, or a compile-time error occurs.

    The type of the postfix increment expression is the type of the variable. The result of the postfix increment expression is not a variable, but a value.

    At run-time, if evaluation of the operand expression completes abruptly, then the postfix increment expression completes abruptly for the same reason and no incrementation occurs. Otherwise, the value 1 is added to the value of the variable and the sum is stored back into the variable. Before the addition, binary numeric promotion (§5.6.2) is performed on the value 1 and the value of the variable. If necessary, the sum is narrowed by a narrowing primitive conversion (§5.1.3) and/or subjected to boxing conversion (§5.1.7) to the type of the variable before it is stored. The value of the postfix increment expression is the value of the variable before the new value is stored.

    EDIT Here’s a more accurate equivalent of what’s going on in your example code:

    Integer x = 0;
    int temp = x.intValue();
    x = temp + 1; // autoboxing!
    System.out.println(temp + ", ");
    System.out.println(x.intValue());
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm doing code review and came across a class that uses all static methods.
Doing some code reviews lately I came across a number of classes that have
I was doing some code review today and came across an old code written
I am doing a code review on some large class libraries and I was
I found some confusing code during code review and am a bit puzzled. Doing
I've been doing some code review and this code seemed weird to me since
I'm doing a review of my first semester C++ class, and I think I
I am doing a code review with a client. It is a proc on
When doing a code review for a colleague today I saw a peculiar thing.
I've started to review some code in a project and found something like this:

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.