Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6382445
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T02:31:22+00:00 2026-05-25T02:31:22+00:00

I was doing some C coding and after reading some C code I’ve noticed

  • 0

I was doing some C coding and after reading some C code I’ve noticed that there are code snippets like

char *foo = (char *)malloc(sizeof(char) * someDynamicAmount);

So I want to ask what’s more C-ish way to allocate memory for char array? Use sizeof(char) and supposedly future-proof the code against any standard changes or omit it and use the number directly?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T02:31:22+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 2:31 am

    The more Cish way would be

    char* foo = malloc(someDynamicAmount * sizeof *foo);
    

    referencing the variable and not the type so that the type isn’t needed.
    And without casting the result of malloc (which is C++ish).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am doing some weekend coding exercises. I have a table that contains some
I'm doing some coding in JSP/Java (without any framework, or other strange things) and
I'm doing some maintenance coding on a webapp and I am getting a javascript
After doing some work with Ruby, Rails, and RSpec last summer and I learned
I've been doing some mocking with RhinoMocks and it requires that mocked methods be
When coding python, I use the logging module a lot. After some bad experiences
I've been doing some little code quizes just to catch back up on my
I was doing some stuff with jQuery parseJSON function. This is the code, which
I'm coming from a Rails background and doing some work on a ASP.NET project
I'm doing some PHP stuff on an Ubuntu server. The path I'm working in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.