Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7691551
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T20:39:03+00:00 2026-05-31T20:39:03+00:00

I was going through a book studying Linked list and saw these lines if(

  • 0

I was going through a book studying Linked list and saw these lines

if( *head == NULL){

}else if ( (*head)->next == (node *) NULL ){

}

what is the difference between NULL and (node *) NULL can they be used interchangeably?

typedef struct nodeType{
    int info;
    struct nodeType *next;
}node;
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T20:39:05+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 8:39 pm

    When comparing pointers, types are not considered, so it is pointless.

    The author likely just included it for clarity if it’s an introductory book. If it’s not an introductory book, then the author either has an odd coding style, or somehow thinks that it’s more meaningful.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have been going through the book Learning WCF trying to get my head
I'm going through the Pro Git book , trying to get my head around
While going through the book Scala for the Impatient , I came across this
I'm going through exercises of a C++ book. For each exercise I want to
I was going through Jeffrey Palermo's book and came across this syntax. private void
We're going through an ASP.Net MVC book and are having trouble with using an
All, I'm going through the Friedman & Felleisen book A Little Java, A Few
I'm going through a book on Java and I've been understanding most of it
I'm going through a book of general c# development, and I've come to the
I'm going through the book Just Java 2 but am evidently missing something basic.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.