Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 938753
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T21:41:26+00:00 2026-05-15T21:41:26+00:00

I was going through the source code of ArrayList. I came across the method

  • 0

I was going through the source code of ArrayList. I came across the method ensureCapacity() which increases the capacity of the data array used internally. In that, the new capacity of the data array was increased based on logic int newCapacity = (oldCapacity * 3)/2 + 1; where old capacity is the current data array size. Is there any particular reason for choosing (oldCapacity * 3)/2 + 1 this as new array size, if so what is it?

/**
 * Increases the capacity of this <tt>ArrayList</tt> instance, if
 * necessary, to ensure that it can hold at least the number of elements
 * specified by the minimum capacity argument.
 *
 * @param   minCapacity   the desired minimum capacity
 */
public void ensureCapacity(int minCapacity) {
modCount++;
int oldCapacity = elementData.length;
if (minCapacity > oldCapacity) {
    Object oldData[] = elementData;
    int newCapacity = (oldCapacity * 3)/2 + 1;
        if (newCapacity < minCapacity)
    newCapacity = minCapacity;
        // minCapacity is usually close to size, so this is a win:
        elementData = Arrays.copyOf(elementData, newCapacity);
}
}

Thanks in advance …

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T21:41:26+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 9:41 pm

    The only guarantee made in the JavaDoc is that adding a new element has constant amortized time. That means that the average time of adding a new element to the array is constant. Sometimes it might take a bit longer (like when trying to resize the array), but overall these cases are rare enough for it not to affect the average too much.

    So for them to be able to respect that guarantee they need to make sure the resizing happens rarely enough as to not affect the average adding time. They use a percent of the current capacity for the new capacity for this reason. If the resize would be something like oldCapacity + 50 the array would be too big for small arrayLists, but if you want to add a few thousand elements, resizing every 50 elements would bring the performance way down. This way the capacity increases exponentially (if you already added a lot of elements, chances are you will add more, so they increase the capacity by more) so it doesn’t degrade the performance too much.

    As to why they chose 50%, perhaps they felt that doubling (or more) the capacity might be overkill (would consume too much extra memory for very large ArrayLists), and going too low (like perhaps 10-25%) would degrade the performance too much (by doing too many reallocations), so probably +50% offered good enough performance, without taking too much extra memory. I’m guessing they did some performance tests before deciding on the value.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've been going through some open-source code for a Twitter app, and came across
while going through some of the mili source code I came across a struct
Going through some documentation on modifying CGImageRef data, I came across a strange example
I was going through the source code for Array.cs when I read that Array.Copy()
Was going through the Filezilla source code and came to this line: int systemFolders[3]
i have been going through the source code of an application which i downloaded
I was going through the source code of ArrayBlockingQueue and LinkedBlockingQueue. LinkedBlockingQueue has a
I'm going through the source code of the less unix tool by Mark Nudelman,
I was going through the documentation and source code of jqGrid 4.3.1 when it
I was going through the source code of jQuery. I'm having trouble understanding the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.