Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 278757
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T01:17:20+00:00 2026-05-12T01:17:20+00:00

I was going through this link: FAT16 Basics to Assemble Clusters . I have

  • 0

I was going through this link: FAT16 Basics to Assemble Clusters. I have read the structures involved in defining a directory entry in FAT. Now when giving the example for a FAT16 File, it says the data cluster is 0x03 for the example file MyFile.txt. Which means if we logically compute the Data Cluster we will be able to reach to the first node which happens to be cluster no 3.

But what I fail to understand is what the author is trying to say in the next line where it says

What we can see in the File Allocation Table at this moment?

How suddenly we reach to the File Allocation Table? Weren’t we already there when we were going through the information of Myfile.txt? I couldn’t find any reason how suddenly the author jumped to an offset location of 00000200 and is identifying the emptiness of the clusters. It will be great if someone can help me understand.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T01:17:21+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 1:17 am

    The author tells you in the bullet points just below.

    But the FAT starts at offset 0x0200, and since the file starts in the 3rd cluster and FAT16 cluster are two bytes (16 bits) in size, you start at offset 2 × 3, or 6.

    On the drive, the allocated size is 32K, and the file size is > 32K × 3 but <= 32K × 4, the file will take four clusters, so the educated guess here during file recovery is that the eight bytes starting at offset six contain the four cluster numbers of the file.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am going through this tutorial about PDO and have come to the point
I was going through some data structures and I noticed this as a time
I was going through this link Will it optimize and wondered how can we
I was going through this link below: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/819267 Here it explains to enable HTTP
Like seriously after going through this... Easy way to dismiss keyboard? ... I have
I was going through the auto_ptr documentation on this link auto_ptr There is something
I was going through this link , where I came across a point Avoid
Possible Duplicate: Why Objective-C doesn't support method overloading? I was going through this link
I have been struggling with this all day and have tried going through the
I am going through this document and this is what I gathered. <Esc> Escape

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.