Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6738045
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T11:19:14+00:00 2026-05-26T11:19:14+00:00

I was just curious as to why the *= operator for left outer join

  • 0

I was just curious as to why the *= operator for left outer join and the ‘=*’ for ‘right outer join were taken out of the SQL standard, or, at least not supported by SQL server 2005 and on? I have read a few other posts on this particular operator and understand that it can give some unexpected results. But if it were semantically equivalent I would think it would be an easier operator to use when having to join multiple tables. If anything, I would rather use this operator to to dynamically create sql queries as opposed to trying to get the correct word order like:

FROM accounts 
LEFT OUTER JOIN customers 
ON accounts.accountnum = customers.accountnum 
LEFT OUTER JOIN products 
ON customers.accountnum = products.accountnum 
AND customers.id = products.customerid  

where

FROM accounts, customers, products
WHERE accounts.accountnum *= customers.accountnum AND
      customers.accountnum *= products.accountnum AND
      customers.id *= products.customer.id

would seem to be easier to parse together.

But back to the real world, what was the idea for these operators if they dont perfom a “true” outer join? The term Short Hand implies that it should do exactly the same thing, but obviosly not in this case.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T11:19:15+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 11:19 am

    SQL Server MVP K. Brian Kelley does a good job of explaining it here: Why SQL Server 2005 Doesn’t Permit Non-ANSI Style OUTER JOINs

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Just curious. How does actually the function Sleep() work (declared in windows.h)? Maybe not
Just curious. Right now I'm using Visual C# Express 2008 for Desktop Apps, and
Just curious to find out exactly what problems I'll cause myself if I include
Just curious about SQL syntax. So if I have SELECT itemName as ItemName, substring(itemName,
Basic question here, just got curious about coding a simple formula out, and wanted
Just curious, I'm wondering what all you experienced programmers or newbies (like me) out
Just curious why the C++ standard library uses all lower case and underscores instead
I understand what the double not operator does in JavaScript . I'm curious about
Just curious here: is it possible to invoke a Windows Blue Screen of Death
Just curious: 4 instanceof Number => false new Number(4) instanceof Number => true? Why

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.