Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3312850
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T22:02:41+00:00 2026-05-17T22:02:41+00:00

I was just doing my first app in C and i have this warning

  • 0

I was just doing my first app in C and i have this warning (edited) : unused variable pp

int compteur =  1;
int *p = &compteur;
int **pp = &p;

I was just trying to make pp pointing on the adress of the variable p

Forgive me if that’s a stupid question, but in my book they don’t talk about pointers on pointer.
Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T22:02:42+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 10:02 pm

    Well if that’s the only thing your program does, then yes, the compiler is correct to warn you about unused variables, because you’re not doing anything with them!

    If you were to do e.g. printf("%d\n", **p);, then the warning should go away.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm just wondering if there's a better way of doing this in SQL Server
There have been a few things in web app's that I don't like. First
This one make me go crazy. I am building an iphone app where the
I'm sure I am just doing something really dumb and not seeing it but
I've just started doing some PowerShell scripting, and I'm running into a problem testing
I'm new to RhinoMock's just been doing state unit testing up till now. How
I just get the beach ball all day long (it's been doing nothing for
When you are doing integration tests with either just your data access layer or
I'm doing a personal, just for fun, project that is using screen scraping to
Just tried to execute a small Lua script, but unfortunately I'm doing something wrong.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.