Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7080091
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T06:45:08+00:00 2026-05-28T06:45:08+00:00

I was looking at some PETSc example code, and I came across this snippet:

  • 0

I was looking at some PETSc example code, and I came across this snippet:

#undef __FUNCT__
#define __FUNCT__ "main"

right before main begins.

Is setting __FUNCT__ or something like it before every function (or just main?) a standard C programming convention?

If so, why is this done?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T06:45:09+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 6:45 am

    This appears to be shorthand or a work-around for a C compiler that doesn’t support the __FUNCTION__ standard macro.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Looking through some code I came across the following code trTuDocPackTypdBd.update(TrTuDocPackTypeDto.class.cast(packDto)); and I'd like
Looking through some java code and this just does not seem right. To me,
Looking at some example code and come across some zero-size array allocation. I created
Looking through some old company code, I came across a for loop that looks
Looking for some guidance on this issue (below is a parallel example): I have
I'm looking for some style advice for testing this piece of (Objective-)C++ code, I
Looking at some source code, I found this operator () => { } From
Looking on some source code I've inherited, there's a snippet of code that calls
Looking for some sample code (C#) for a simple thread pool implementation. I found
Looking at some code I'm maintaining in System Verilog I see some signals that

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.