Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9210157
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T01:00:13+00:00 2026-06-18T01:00:13+00:00

I was looking for a way to create an array like: [[1,1], [1,2], [1,3]

  • 0

I was looking for a way to create an array like:

[[1,1], [1,2], [1,3]
[2,1], [2,2], [2,3]
[3,1], [3,2], [3,3]]

For now I came up with this solution:

w=3 # or any int
h=3 # or any int
array = []
iw=1
while iw<=w do
  ih=1
  while ih <=h do
    array<<[iw, ih]
    ih+=1
  end#do
  iw+=1
end#do

But, I’m sure there must be a quicker way..?
This takes 1.107 seconds… (w=1900; h=1080)
Regards

EDIT:
I should’ve noticed that I’m stuck with 1.8.6..

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T01:00:15+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 1:00 am

    This is similar to @nicooga’s answer, but I would use a range instead of manually creating the array (ie so you do not have to type each number for larger arrays).

    range = (1..3).to_a
    range.product(range)
    #=> [[1, 1], [1, 2], [1, 3], [2, 1], [2, 2], [2, 3], [3, 1], [3, 2], [3, 3]]
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm looking for way to create list view as like in IOS with pinned
I am looking for a way to create a new array based on array
I am now diving into boost::iostreams and I'm looking for a way to create
I want to create array 10 * 10 * 10 in C# like int[][][]
I am looking for a way to shuffle an array of known values (like
I know how to achieve this, but it doesn't seem like the ruby way
I looking for a way to create Delta Diff Patches of Large Binary Files
I'm looking for a way to create a function that can be used in
I'm looking for a way to create an automatic forwarder (web-browser userscript) if a
I'm looking for a way to create a QR Code and a shortened link

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.