Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8020435
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 4, 20262026-06-04T21:41:31+00:00 2026-06-04T21:41:31+00:00

i was looking on the jQuery source code and then i saw that they

  • 0

i was looking on the jQuery source code and then i saw that they use foo.call(context) instead of context.foo().
for example- assuming this is array they use:

return slice.call( this );

instead of:

return this.slice();

what is the difference and is it the prefer way (in terms of performance) doing those calls?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-04T21:41:33+00:00Added an answer on June 4, 2026 at 9:41 pm

    The problem is that “foo” might not actually be a property of “context”. When that’s the case, the only real choice is to use .call() (or .apply(), as appropriate).

    If you do have an object with a “foo” property that’s a function, then there’s no real reason to use .call().

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Looking at this jQuery example, how can I modify the code so that it
I was looking at the jQuery UI code, and I found that every file
I'm looking at jQuery source code for tracking the domready event and there's one
I was looking over the JavaScript source code for SlickGrid . I've noticed that
I was looking at the SO source code to see how they are doing
I was looking through the source of jQuery (specifically the queue() function) and saw
I've been looking around JQuery libraries for the URL hash, but found none that
I am looking for jQuery plugin that will open an html under an input
Looking for a jQuery MultiSelect Widget that can handle thousands of items. Really like
EDIT: I THOUGHT The jQuery source I was looking at did something like this:

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.