Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1056135
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T17:40:19+00:00 2026-05-16T17:40:19+00:00

I was looking over the js source code for Scrabb.ly . I’ve noticed that

  • 0

I was looking over the js source code for Scrabb.ly.

I’ve noticed that they would do something like so for each of their distinct “classes”:

var Board = (function() {
  var self = {};

  // settings for board
  self.options = {
    debug: true,
    addedPlayTiles: function() {},
    clearedPlayTiles: function() {}
  };

  // set to true once the board has been setup
  self.isSetup = false;

  // quick access to square elements
  self.squares = {};
  self.squareCount = 0;

  self.setup = function(options) {
    self.log("Setting up board!");

    // set options
    _.each(options, function(val, key) {
      self.options[key] = val;
    });

    return self;
})();

Some code from the middle has been omitted but this should give you the general idea.

  1. What is the purpose of the the following: (function() { // code })(); Is this the module pattern that I’ve seen talked about? Is this meant to keep the global namespace clean?
  2. What does this line mean?: var self = {} Is the self object used to exposed ‘public’ members? How would you define a private function or variable?
  3. How would you instantiate multiple “Boards” if you wanted to?
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T17:40:20+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 5:40 pm

    It’s called the Module Pattern.

    The parentheses around the function mean it’s being evaluated immediately after being defined — so in essence it’s a Singleton. Since it’s an anonymous function, the definition is not stored – so you cannot readily create new instances of this object without a few modifications (which will be discussed later).

    You are correct, self contains the “public” methods and properties, as it were. Any variables that aren’t defined in self are not visible to the outside because of the closure properties. However, any functions defined in self still have access to the private variables because in Javascript, functions maintain access to the context (including variables) in which they were defined — with a few exceptions.. mainly arguments and this.

    If you want to define multiple instances of this object, you would remove the parentheses (var Board = function () { ... }) and then use var obj = Board() to create an object. Note that it does not use the new operator.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I was looking over this code to calculate math.sqrt in Java. Why did they
I'm looking for books or online resources that go in detail over programming techniques
I'm looking over my syllabus for my theoretical computer science class and within the
So, I was looking over my standard cache utility when preparing to unit test
Its possible I am just really really thick. However, looking over the SDK for
I am looking at nServiceBus and came over this interface namespace NServiceBus { public
I am looking for a robust way to copy files over a Windows network
I am looking for a way to have some control over the shape of
I'm looking into a mechanism for serialize data to be passed over a socket
I am looking for any examples or guides to using Linq over WCF (n-tier

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.