Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3490746
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T11:33:12+00:00 2026-05-18T11:33:12+00:00

I was performing some test performance on an algorithm and noticed something weird. Maybe

  • 0

I was performing some test performance on an algorithm and noticed something weird. Maybe I am missing something here.

I first measure the time in milliseconde:

long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
x.sort(sortStringInput);
long endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();

and then in nanoseconde:

long startTime = System.nanoTime();
x.sort(sortStringInput);
long endTime = System.nanoTime();

The results are 437ms qnd 26366ns.

I am calling the same method so how can it be possible to get a result in ns which is way smaller than the one in ms. I know that 1 ms is 1 000 000 ns so 26366 is even smaller than 1 ms…

Thanks,

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T11:33:12+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 11:33 am

    Are you sorting the same list twice? The second call will be extremely fast if the list is already sorted.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm looking for some way of performing the opposite of a Porter Stemmer algorithm
I am wanting to store the state of some actions the user is performing
A similar question was already asked ( Performing a Stress Test on Web Application?
I'm performing some custom js validation on my forms, triggered by submitting the form
In optimising some code recently, we ended up performing what I think is a
When performing string concatentation of an existing string in the intern pool, is a
I am performing two validations on the client side on the samve event. I
I'm performing a bulk insert with an ADO.NET 2.0 SqlBulkCopy object from a C#
I'm performing a UrlRewrite for my main category pages. Converting: www.mysite.com/Category.aspx?id=2 to www.mysite.com/Dogs In
I've been too lax with performing DB backups on our internal servers. Is there

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.