Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 521651
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T08:16:19+00:00 2026-05-13T08:16:19+00:00

I was reading Loose Coupling and its benefits which are really good stuff but

  • 0

I was reading Loose Coupling and its benefits which are really good stuff but I started wondering which tools are great to create loosely-coupled solutions ? First what came to my mind are Type and Interfaces and Abstract classes but I am sure there are so many ways to provide loose coupling. Maybe Polymorphism helps to create loosely-coupled objects and systems.

Thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T08:16:20+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 8:16 am

    This is a very broad question – possibly too broad to answer.

    However, two methodologies that can provide a solution with “loose coupling” are:

    Dependency Injection

    Dependency Injection (especially when using an Inversion of Control Container) provides loose coupling within an application or solution – With dependency injection you do not hard code your references to dependent objects, instead you code to interfaces and inject implementations of those interfaces.

    Here is a quick code example of a Logging component of an application, that implements an ILogger interface

    public class ConcreteLogger : ILogger
    {
    
        public LogMessage(string message)
        {
            Log.Write(message);
        }
    }
    

    One of your classes then receives this concrete implementation of the logger interface.

    public class MyClass
    {
        private ILogger logger;
    
        public myClass(ILogger logger)
        {
            this.logger = logger;
        }
    
        public void DoSomething()
        {
            // Now if DoSomething needs to call logging it can call what ever ILogger was passed in
            this.logger.Log("We did something");
        }
    }
    

    Service Orientation

    Service Orientation provides loose coupling between different subsystems of a solution – With Service Orientation each part of a solution becomes its own stand alone services that publishes and interfaces (often a messaging based interface).

    This means that an application when needing for example to talk to the Shipping subsystem of a solution only needs to know about the systems interfaces and its address, and does not need to know anything about its internal implementation. This can almost be seen as a broader application of basic OO principles.


    Both of these provide two different types of loose coupling (that is one of the problems with your question, the term it self is loosely defined)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Why does reading from __DATA__ work and reading from the file doesn't (Loose unescaped
Reading among the list of possibilities of the Java ME platform, its possible for
Reading some posts from Jimmy Boggard and wondering - how exactly is it possible
A little background: I'm using Spring and Hibernate to create a really simple domain/dao/service
Im reading Jon Skeet book. (#4) but one thing (among others) caught my eye
Reading about and using the Amazon Web Services, I'm not really able to grasp
I came across reading about real time protocol in Wikipedia, which mentions the following
I was doing some .NET programming in WPF which involved reading .png and .txt
We have been developing code using loose coupling and dependency injection. A lot of
I have been reading the Android documentation and I am wondering if anyone can

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.