Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3226292
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T16:26:20+00:00 2026-05-17T16:26:20+00:00

I was reading now about how it’s a good practice to set the font

  • 0

I was reading now about how it’s a good practice to set the font on <body> to 62.5%, so that later you can use the divide-by-10 conversion from pixel units.

But I was wondering: why not set <body> to 6.25%? Then you can use the same dimensions for em units as for pixel units, assuming the default browser font size is 16 pixels.

E.g.

body {
    font-size: 6.25%; /* 1px */
}

p {
    font-size: 12em; /* 12px */
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T16:26:20+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 4:26 pm

    Two issues.

    1. I seem to remember that if you set your initial font size quite small using a relative unit like ems, if the user resizes the text Internet Explorer, the font size will change quite a lot between the settings.

      It’s an odd phenomenon, and I’m not sure if it still occurs in IE, nor if you’re worried about users in IE who change the font size.

    2. You’re potentially condemning yourself to re-setting the font size every time you nest elements.

      An answer I wrote to another question tries its best to explain this, but in short, if you’re doing your font sizes in ems, you’re better off using font-size as little as possible, rather than making it ever-so-slightly easier to use font-size when you do.

      For example: say you want all <li>s on the site to use a font size of 12 pixels.

      li {
          font-size: 12em;/* 12px */
      }
      

      If you then use the following HTML:

      <ul>
          <li>
              <ul>
                  <li>
                  ...
      

      Then you need to do this:

      li li {
          font-size: .083em;/* 12px */
      }
      

      Otherwise the inner <li>s will be 12 pixels * 12 pixels = 144 pixels!

      Ems aren’t pixels. Ems refer to a percentage of the nearest ancestor’s font size, whereas pixels refer to actual pixels. In my opinion, trying to turn ems into pixels is more confusing than the alternative. You’re better off setting <body> to the most commonly used font size on the site, only changing from that when you need to, and putting the intended size in pixels in a comment after your em-based declaration. (That way, it’s easier to tell later if you’ve got something wrong.)

      (Of course, the only reason we avoid pixels is because IE doesn’t change the size of text sized in pixels when the user changes the font size in the browser. If you’re not worried about that, then just use pixels.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've been reading things here and there for a while now about using an
I am just now learning about function pointers and, as I was reading the
Right now, I'm particularly interested in reading the data from MP3 files (ID3 tags?),
I was reading http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2009/01/27/asp-net-mvc-1-0-release-candidate-now-available.aspx and noticed a Fantastic color scheme used to illustrate their
another request sorry.. Right now I am reading the tokens in one by one
I've started with ASP.NET MVC recently, reading blogs, tutorials, trying some routes, etc. Now,
Reading this question I found this as (note the quotation marks) code to solve
Reading an article called Increase LINQ Query Performance in July's MSDN magazine, the author
Reading over the responses to this question Disadvantages of Test Driven Development? I got
Reading through the Flickr API documentation it keeps stating I require an API key

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.