Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6244719
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T12:22:34+00:00 2026-05-24T12:22:34+00:00

I was reading the C++0x faq and came across the section detailing initializer lists.

  • 0

I was reading the C++0x faq and came across the section detailing initializer lists. The examples were mostly variations of:

vector<int> vi = { 1, 2, 3 };
vector<int> vj({1, 2, 3});
// etc.

However, also listed was the form:

vector<int> vk{2};

This form appears elsewhere in the faq, and I am curious as to whether it is semantically different from the initial two forms, or just syntactic sugar for vk({x, y, z}).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T12:22:37+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 12:22 pm

    One is uniform initialization, and the other is initializer lists. They are two different things, although as you can see, they can produce similar syntax.

    vector<int> vk{2};
    

    is a uniform initialization- the other two are initializer lists.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Reading on another forum I've came across the world of CSS Frameworks. The one
I was reading the SQLite FAQ , and came upon this passage: Threads are
I was just reading the section of the C FAQ on pointers . It
I have been reading through the C++ FAQ and was curious about the friend
I'm reading a book C progaming faq's. Here is passage of the book Automatic
Lately, I've been reading much about constructors from the well-received C++ FAQ . One
After reading the faq's and everything else I can find, I'm still confused. If
I was reading the C++0x FAQ by Stroustrup and got stuck with this code.
I was reading Stroustrup's c++ FAQ and I noticed that, at one point, he
I was reading the C++ FAQ and it says The C++ language guarantees a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.