Question

I was reading the responses to “Printing 1 to 1000 without loop or conditionals” and I am wondering why it is necessary to have the special case for NumberGeneration<1> in the top answer.

If I remove that and add a check for N == 1 in the template (code below), the code fails compilation with “template instantiation depth exceeds maximum” but I’m not sure why. Are conditionals handled differently in compile-time?

#include <iostream>

template<int N>
struct NumberGeneration
{
    static void out(std::ostream& os)
    {
        if (N == 1)
        {
            os << 1 << std::endl;
        }
        else
        {
            NumberGeneration<N-1>::out(os);
            os << N << std::endl;
        }
    }
};

int main()
{
    NumberGeneration<1000>::out(std::cout);
}

Answer 1

Code generation and compilation doesn’t branch depending on conditionals! Consider this:

// don't declare bar()!

void foo()
{
     if (false) { bar(); }
}

If you never declare bar(), this is a compilation error even though the inner scope can never be reached. For the same reason, NumberGeneration<N-1> is always instantiated, no matter whether that branch can be reached or not, and you have infinite recursion.

Indeed, the static analogue of conditionals is precisely template specialization:

template <> struct NumberGeneration<0> { /* no more recursion here */ };