Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8776837
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T19:08:59+00:00 2026-06-13T19:08:59+00:00

I was reading through a presentation on the implementation of malloc , and on

  • 0

I was reading through a presentation on the implementation of malloc, and on slide 7 it suggests storing a regions size and availability in a single word to save space. The alternative is to use two words, which is wasteful as the availability bit only needs to be 0 or 1.

This is the given explanation:

  • If blocks are aligned, low-order address bits are always 0
  • Why store an always-0 bit?
  • Use it as allocated/free flag! When reading size word, must mask out this bit

http://courses.engr.illinois.edu/cs241/sp2012/lectures/09-malloc.pdf

But I’m not really understanding how this works and how it could be implemented in C. Why is one bit of the size integer always 0?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T19:09:00+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 7:09 pm
    • If blocks are aligned, low-order address bits are always 0

    This is the key to understanding what it going on. Many CPUs require that multibyte primitive values be stored at addresses divisible by the number of bytes in the primitive: 16-bit primitives need to be stored at even addresses; 32-bit ints need to be stored at addresses divisible by four, and so on. An attempt to access an int through a pointer that corresponds to an odd address results in a bus error.

    In systems like that malloc must always return an address suitable for storing any primitive supported by the given CPU. Therefore, if CPU supports 32-bit integers, all addresses returned by malloc must be divisible by 4. Such addresses are said to be aligned. To comply, malloc implementations pad sizes blocks requested by the program by 0 to 3 bytes at the end to have length divisible by 4. As a consequence of this decision, the last two bits of an address of an aligned block will always be zero. An implementation of malloc can use these bits for its own purposes, as long as they are “masked out” before returning the result to callers.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am reading through the presentation Building memory efficient Java applications , and saw
Reading through this excellent article about safe construction techniques by Brain Goetz, I got
Reading through some of the questions here, the general concensus seems to be that
Reading through the SendAsync , BeginAsync method illustrations of Socket s, I realized that
Reading through documentation, I found following: 1.9.1 1.8.4 1.8.2 A version of 1.8.2 select
Reading through the Wikipedia article on First-Class functions, there is a nice table of
Was reading through some text and playing around with attempting to write past the
While reading through another question here, on creating a URL shortening service, it was
It's clear from reading through threads that I can call a PHP function using
I'm currently reading through this jquery masking plugin to try and understand how it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.