Home/ Questions/Q 6583419
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-25T16:24:23+00:00

I was recently asked to add some Woopra JavaScript to a website and noticed

  • 0

I was recently asked to add some Woopra JavaScript to a website and noticed that the URL started with a double slash (i.e. omitted the scheme). I’ve never seen this before, so I went trying to find out more about it, but the only thing I could really find was an item on the Woopra FAQ:

The Woopra JavaScript in the Setup does not include http in the URL call for the script. This is correct. The JavaScript has been optimized to run very fast and efficiently on your site.

However, some validation and site testing/debugging services and tools do not recognize the code as correct. It is correct and valid. If the warnings annoy you, just add the http to the script’s URL. It will not impact the script.

(For clarification, the URL is “//static.woopra.com/js/woopra.v2.js”—the colon is omitted in addition to the “http”.)

Is there any more information about this practice? If this is indeed valid, there must be a spec that talks about it, and I’d very much like to see it.

Thanks in advance for satisfying my curiousity!

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    This is a valid URL. It’s called a "network-path reference" as defined in RFC 3986. When you don’t specify a scheme/protocol, it will fall back to the current scheme. So if you are viewing a page via https:// all network path references will also use https.

    For an example, here’s a link to the RFC 3986 document again but with a network path reference. If you were viewing this page over https (although it looks like you can’t use https with StackOverflow) the link will reflect your current URI scheme, unlike the first link.

    • 0