Home/ Questions/Q 172553
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-11T13:11:11+00:00

I was running into this error An attempt to attach an auto-named database for

  • 0

I was running into this error

An attempt to attach an auto-named database for file C:\<...>\Out\MessagesDB.mdf failed. A database with the same name exists, or specified file cannot be opened, or it is located on UNC share..

attempting to write some unit tests for testing a controler. I belived the problem was that the tests were attempting to not use the database I had defined in the main project. So I modified the connection string in the tests to

In the App.config for the test project I’m using

<connectionStrings>     <add name='MessagesDBConnectionString' connectionString='Data Source=.\SQLEXPRESS;AttachDbFilename=|DataDirectory|\MessagesDB.mdf;Integrated Security=True;User Instance=True'       providerName='System.Data.SqlClient' /> </connectionStrings>

and then overrode the DataDirectory by doing

AppDomain domain = AppDomain.CurrentDomain;

        String currentDirectory = System.Environment.CurrentDirectory;         String DataDirectory = currentDirectory.Substring(0, currentDirectory.IndexOf('TestResults')) + 'Server\\App_Data';         domain.SetData('DataDirectory', DataDirectory);         db = new Server.Models.MessagesDBDataContext();

Which works great but looks like a hack. How should I have done this?

Edit:

I took another look at this terrible mess today and based off of the Nerd Dinner example I removed all direct calls to the database from the controllers in my project and moved them into a repository object which implements an interface (IRepository). Then I created a fake repository object which also implemented IRepository. I added a constructor to each controller which allowed passing in an IRepository to be used. The default controller constructor was then changed to initialize a repository. The tests no longer talk to the database so they are faster and far less destructive.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. The standard approach is to mock out the database. That means the class you’re testing takes a parameter which provides data, and looks like a database connection.

    In the unit tests, you actually pass in an implementation that provides hard coded data.

    There are tools which can help you with this, for example by saving the results of a database query into a config file, so that you can set up the test with real data, but it will load quickly and never change because it is now saved in a file separate from the database. SnapDAL is one tool you can use for this.

    • 0