Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7057607
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T04:00:26+00:00 2026-05-28T04:00:26+00:00

I was stunned to learn that comparing two Boolean Objects with == can get

  • 0

I was stunned to learn that comparing two Boolean Objects with == can get the wrong answer.

Look at the test code below. Test a and Test c give consistent answers.

Test b fails. It seems that new Boolean(true) can create a separate object with the same value, instead of returning a reference to Boolean.TRUE;

public static void main(String[] args) {
    Boolean a = Boolean.TRUE; 
    Boolean b = new Boolean(true); 
    Boolean c = null; 
    boolean x = true;
    boolean y = false;

    System.out.println("Test a");
    System.out.println(( a == Boolean.TRUE ) ? "TRUE" : "FALSE");
    System.out.println(( Boolean.TRUE.equals(a)) ? "TRUE" : "FALSE");
    System.out.println("Test b");
    System.out.println(( b == Boolean.TRUE ) ? "TRUE" : "FALSE");
    System.out.println(( Boolean.TRUE.equals(b)) ? "TRUE" : "FALSE");
    System.out.println("Test c");
    System.out.println(( c == Boolean.TRUE ) ? "TRUE" : "FALSE");
    System.out.println(( Boolean.TRUE.equals(c)) ? "TRUE" : "FALSE");

    /*  OUTPUT is
    Test a
    TRUE
    TRUE
    Test b
    FALSE
    TRUE
    Test c
    FALSE
    FALSE        
    */
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T04:00:26+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 4:00 am

    Because Boolean is a reference type and == tests if they are the same object in memory then you get false because you allocated b with new.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm absolutely stunned by the fact that MS just couldn't get it right to
I am a bit stunned by lots of reactions on questions that point out
I'm stunned by a simple thing that I want to accomplish but does not
How can I express to PostgreSQL that I want values simultaneously from several hierarchical
I'm looking for an SMTP server that I can setup on a windows machine:
I'm stunned, why does this code give me a segmentation fault? #include <stdio.h> #define
I'm creating site using MVC architecture and get stunned when I came to AJAX.
I'm kind of stunned that the python datetime .isoformat() function doesn't return correct information.
I'm quite stunned to find out that show is an S4 generic, and that
Just came across this guy that left me stunned: gcc -E -dM - </dev/null

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.