Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3871252
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T21:48:22+00:00 2026-05-19T21:48:22+00:00

I was surprised when the following worked template<typename T> void f(T &…); I thought

  • 0

I was surprised when the following worked

template<typename T>
void f(T &...);

I thought that I have to declare “T” as “typename …T” then, and that it only works in C++0x. But the above compiled in strict C++03 mode. What’s going on?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T21:48:23+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 9:48 pm

    It’s just the bad old C varargs syntax; the grammar allows omitting the comma. The following are equivalent:

    int printf(const char* fmt, ...);
    int printf(const char* fmt...);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I was surprised to find that the following example code only updates a single
i am surprised why following algorithm shows me ,that matrix is not invertible,i have
I am surprised that the following calls result in type-cast warning: I have a
I was surprised to find that the following code System.out.println("Character size:"+Character.SIZE/8); System.out.println("String size:"+"a".getBytes().length); outputs
I'm surprised that MS has implemented a new feature: Validation with INotifyDataErrorInfo I have
So far I thought that the following syntax was invalid, int B[ydim][xdim]; But today
I was surprised the following code resulted in a could not deduce template argument
I was a little surprised that the following code did not work as expected:
I'm very surprised to find that the following compiles: #include <iostream> using namespace std;
I have written the following code and was surprised at the output. I heard

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.