Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 716163
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T05:16:05+00:00 2026-05-14T05:16:05+00:00

I was taking a look at Star Schema Benchmark and then I was thinking

  • 0

I was taking a look at Star Schema Benchmark and then I was thinking is it possible to denormalize all tables from the SSB?

So database size will increase a lot but potentially the performance will grow up. Is that right? Is it possible?

Thanks and sorry for my poor English.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T05:16:06+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 5:16 am

    In most cases less relationships (joins) means higher performance. Usually denormalization is good in small portions and in balance with normalization. It is the balance between speed and good design. For example Data Warehouses are composed of very flat denormalized tables so they can increase the performance. The idea of flat databases is further developed in the Couch DB for example.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm taking a look at how to properly escape data that comes from the
I am trying to learn mySQL database, and have started taking a look at
The question says it all. I was taking a look at Can a recursive
Taking a look at my question HERE , I now want to return the
After taking a look at this SO question and doing my own research, it
I've been taking a look at some different products for .NET which propose to
I'm taking a look at how the model system in django works and I
I was taking a look through some open-source C++ code and I noticed a
I was taking a look at http://www.zenfolio.com/zf/features.aspx and I can't figure out how they
Thanks for taking a look at this. The issue has to do with the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.