Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6661925
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T02:20:09+00:00 2026-05-26T02:20:09+00:00

I was told that every method has a stack the size of 1mb. So

  • 0

I was told that every method has a stack the size of 1mb.
So I assumed that initializing 256 integer values in one method will cause a StackOverflowException. I tried that in code, but no exception was thrown.

So, how to deliberately trigger a StackOverflowException without using recursion?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T02:20:10+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 2:20 am

    I’ll add another method 🙂

    unsafe struct FixedBufferExample
    {
        public fixed byte Buffer[128 * 1024]; // This is a fixed buffer.
    }
    

    Now this structure is 128kb 🙂 If you declare a local variable (of a method that doesn’t use yield or async) of type FixedBufferExample it should use 128kb of stack. You can use up your stack quite quickly.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've been told that every COM method callable from C++ code (take for instance
My company has a product that will I feel can benefit from a web
I recall that one should always avoid using recursive method calls in Java .
I've always been told that adding an element to an array happens like this:
I have been told that there is a performance difference between the following code
I've been told that I should include PAD files with the freeware applications I
I am told that good developers can spot/utilize the difference between Null and False
I'm told that the template system in C++ is Turing-complete at compile time. This
I am told that SQL Server 2005 installation with BI tools and SQL Server
I've been told that the java class TreeMap uses an implementation of a RB

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.