Question

I was trying to do a regex for someone else when I ran into this problem. The requirement was that the regex should return results from a set of strings that has, let’s say, ‘apple’ in it. For example, consider the following strings:

'I have an apple' 'You have two Apples' 'I give you one more orange'

The result set should have the first two strings.

The regex(es) I tried are:

/[aA]pple/ and /[^a-zA-Z0-9][aA]pple/

The problem with the first one is that words like ‘aapple’, ‘bapple’, etc (ok, so they are meaningless, but still…) test positive with it, and the problem with the second one is that when a string actually starts with the word ‘apple’, ‘Apples and oranges’, for example, it tests negative. Can someone explain why the second regex behaves this way and what the correct regex would be?

Answer 1

/(^.*?\bapples?\b.*$)/i 

Edit: The above will match the entire string containing the word ‘apples’, which I thought is what you were asking for. If you are just trying to see if the string contains the word, the following will work.

/\bapples?\b/i 

The regex(es) I tried are:

/[aA]pple/ and /[^a-zA-Z0-9][aA]pple/

The first one just checks for the existence of the following characters, in order: a-p-p-l-e, regardless of what context they are used in. The \b, or word-boundary character, matches any spot where a non-word character and a word character meet, ala \W\w.

The second one is trying to match other characters before the occurrance of a-p-p-l-e, and is essentially the same as the first, except it requires other characters in front of it.

The one I answered with works like following. From the beginning of the string, matches any characters (if they exist) non-greedily until it encounters a word boundary. If the string starts with apple, the beginning of a string is a word-boundary, so it still matches. It then matches the letters a-p-p-l-e, and s if it exists, followed by another word boundary. It then matches all characters to the end of the string. The /i at the end means it’s case-insensitive, so ‘Apple’, ‘APPLE’, and ‘apple’ are all valid.

If you have the time, I would highly recommend walking through the tutorial at http://regular-expressions.info. It really goes in-depth and talks about how the regular expression engines match different expressions, it helped me a ton.