Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 650629
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T22:04:27+00:00 2026-05-13T22:04:27+00:00

I was trying to get Matz and Flanagan’s Ruby Programming Language metaprogramming chapter into

  • 0

I was trying to get Matz and Flanagan’s “Ruby Programming Language” metaprogramming chapter into my head, However I couldn’t understand the output from the following code snippet that I dreamed up:

p Module.constants.length           # => 88
$snapshot1 = Module.constants       
class A
  NAME=:abc

  $snapshot2 = Module.constants
  p $snapshot2.length               # => 90
  p $snapshot2 - $snapshot1         # => ["A", "NAME"]

end
p Module.constants.length           # => 89
p Module.constants - $snapshot1     # => ["A"]
p A.constants                       # => ["NAME"]

The book states that the class method constants returns the list of constants for the class (as you can see in the output for A.constants).
I was trying to get the list of constants defined for the Module class when I came across the above strange behavior.

A‘s constants show up in Module.constants. How do I get the list of constants defined by the Module class?

The docs state

Module.constants returns all constants defined in the system. including names of all classes and methods

Since A inherits its implementation from Module.constants, how does it behave differently in the base and derived types?

p A.class               # => Class
p A.class.ancestors       # => [Class, Module, Object, Kernel]

Note: If you’re using Ruby 1.9, constants would return an array of symbols instead of strings.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T22:04:27+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 10:04 pm

    Good question!

    Your confusion is due to the fact that the class method Module.constants hides the instance method Module#constants for Module.

    In Ruby 1.9, this has been addressed by adding an optional parameter:

    # No argument: same class method as in 1.8:
    Module.constants         # ==> All constants
    # One argument: uses the instance method:
    Module.constants(true)   # ==> Constants of Module (and included modules)
    Module.constants(false)  # ==> Constants of Module (only).
    

    In your example above, A.constants calls Module#constants (the instance method), while Module.constants calls, well, Module.constants.

    In Ruby 1.9, you thus want to call Module.constants(true).

    In Ruby 1.8, it is possible to call the instance method #constants on Module. You need to get the instance method and bind it as a class method (using a different name):

    class << Module
      define_method :constants_of_module, Module.instance_method(:constants)
    end
    
    # Now use this new class method:
    class Module
       COOL = 42
    end
    Module.constants.include?("COOL")  # ==> false, as you mention
    Module.constants_of_module         # ==> ["COOL"], the result you want
    

    I wish I was able to backport the 1.9 functionality completely to 1.8 for my backports gem, but I can’t think of a way to get only the constants of a Module, excluding the inherited ones, in Ruby 1.8.

    Edit: Just changed the official documentation to correctly reflect this…

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 323k
  • Answers 323k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You should cache your popularity rating in an own column… May 14, 2026 at 1:05 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You might want to implement an IHttpHandler to track your… May 14, 2026 at 1:05 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If your bean is managed by the webapp's spring context,… May 14, 2026 at 1:05 am

Related Questions

I was trying to get my head around XAML and thought that I would
I was trying to get my Netbeans to autocomplete with PHP , and I
I was trying to get a list of all python and html files in
I was trying to get a Uuid via NtAllocateUuids or simply calling UuidCreateSequential, but
I was trying to get some unit tests to work when I got an

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.