Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 267421
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T23:32:54+00:00 2026-05-11T23:32:54+00:00

I was trying to rebuild my kernel after modifying some source files and noticed

  • 0

I was trying to rebuild my kernel after modifying some source files and noticed the following message in the build output:

II: New modules (you’ve been busy, wipe the poop off your nose)

What is that supposed to mean?

What other weirdness awaits me in the Kernel?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T23:32:55+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 11:32 pm

    This error is produced by a module checking script that is part of the kernel build process for Ubuntu. There is actually a bug filed about its inappropriateness.

    The script checks to see if there are any missing modules from this build compared to previous builds. It is used to catch configuration settings that inadvertently result in any modules not being built (see this post).

    Your message is an informative one and not an error. It simply means that there have been new modules compiled in this build and should not require any action on your part.

    Incidentally, if you’re interested in looking at other inappropriate language in the Linux kernel, check out these graphs.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 326k
  • Answers 326k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Any infinite loops in there? Javascript doesn't like those. Another… May 14, 2026 at 1:49 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer i will reveal you a secret. 2d (and 3d) arrays… May 14, 2026 at 1:49 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you just need to know if it exists, then… May 14, 2026 at 1:49 am

Related Questions

I am using IIRF - an ISAPI rewrite filter for pretty URL's. I haven't
Thanks to 'Beta' my solution: RLS_DIRECTORY = $(shell svnversion -cn | sed 's/:/-/') SVN_VERSION
If I put a header (a.h) into stdafx.h and that header includes another header
My .NET 2.0 application imports unmanaged 32 bit dll. The dll is loaded (first

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.